Obama moving to limit fishing access - ESPN
The Obama administration will accept no more public input for a federal strategy that could prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing the nation’s oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes, and even inland waters.
Anglering for access united we fish rally capitol washington fishing
AP/Luis M. AlvarezOne sign at the United We Fish rally at the Capital summed up the feelings of recreational and commercial fishermen.
This announcement comes at the time when the situation supposedly still is “fluid” and the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force still hasn’t issued its final report on zoning uses of these waters.That’s a disappointment, but not really a surprise for fishing industry insiders who have negotiated for months with officials at the Council on Environmental Quality and bureaucrats on the task force. These angling advocates have come to suspect that public input into the process was a charade from the beginning.
“When the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) completed their successful campaign to convince the Ontario government to end one of the best scientifically managed big game hunts in North America (spring bear), the results of their agenda had severe economic impacts on small family businesses and the tourism economy of communities across northern and central Ontario,” said Phil Morlock, director of environmental affairs for Shimano.
“Now we see NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) and the administration planning the future of recreational fishing access in America based on a similar agenda of these same groups and other Big Green anti-use organizations, through an Executive Order by the President. The current U.S. direction with fishing is a direct parallel to what happened in Canada with hunting: The negative economic impacts on hard working American families and small businesses are being ignored.
Key points: Input from leftist “environmental” (watermelons - green on the outside, red on the inside), and “Executive Order,” as in Obama as tyrant - again.
Honest to god, they won’t stop until they take every cent of your money, and control every aspect of your lives, and probably not even then. They can still impose a North Korean-style slave state, and start taking your actual flesh.


I actually bought one of these recently because they are very cheap, but, y’know…
Mmmmm…I heart the .45 version when it comes out, rws.
.45, estimated availability August. I need one of these.
On a related note, anyone noticed that the ammo shortage appears to be greatly eased?
I like the .40 a little better for it’s longer range ballistics, but I can see the .45 version being a very nice unit to have around the house, for “vermin” control. Especially since that big, slow .45 bullet just cries out for a suppressor to avoid annoying the neighbors.
Quick range report: I can hit the range gong, about a foot square, at 200 yards 3 out of 5 times using a red dot sight. Of course that’s about a 40″ holdover, and instead of the “bong” you normally get with a rifle you only get a “tink” from the weenie 9mm, but at least the rifle is accurate enough for friendly socializing. And all the folk that have tried it out have had a big grin on their faces and vow to “get them one”.
Guess I’ll have to buy the other variations as they become available.
Don’t be paranoid. This a made up conspiracy by some guys who belong in a mental hospital–certified Orly Taitz material.
No one is advocating for a ban on sportfishing. Focus on stuff that has at least a chance of being true.
Mr Driveby, go teach your grandmother to suck eggs. A lot of us here are gun owners, whether for sport, for work, or for militia. We’ve seen a lot of “No one is advocating for a ban” turn into bans.