Allah reports on the folllowing Rassmussen poll:
Hot Air » Blog Archive » Rasmussen: Huckabee 29, Romney 24, Palin 18
He then notes:
Palin and Huckabee might be the most personally authentic, salt-of-the-earth candidates of the bunch, but does that necessarily mean they’re less likely to get rolled by Democrats if elected? Because that’s all I care about.
In the RasPoll, Palin has dropped from 24 to 18%, and Huckabee has increased from 22 to 29 percent. Romney is almost unchanged, 25-24%.
These are the three poles of the GOP: Huckabee represents the religious/socon wing: Romney fronts the establishment/RINO wing; and Palin bears the standard for the conservative/libertarian wing.
In an earlier post, I mentioned “crap croissant” GOP voters - these are the voters who will vote for anybody the GOP runs, no matter how bad they are as candidates. I suspect Romney is picking up most of these votes. The GOP’s socon/religious wing has traditionally numbered about a third of the GOP total vote. When it drops, these folks don’t vote for somebody else, they stay home. Huckabee, or any candidate with a strong tie to evangelical Christianity, will have their vote until or unless he goes away. Then part of it will go to whomever the GOP nominates, and the rest will vote “absent.” If the absentees are numerous enough, the GOP loses.
The third group - conservatives and libertarians - tends to be driven by concerns about personal liberty. They are the heirs of the original Republicans, the idealists who battled slavery and then, over the years until subsumed into the larger Statist Coalition after the loss of faith engendered by the Crash and Depression, and the FDR takeover, stood for individual liberty, small government, strong defense, and constitutional integrity. They are a minority within the GOP, but not as small a minority as indicated by the Palin drop.
But Palin has been the focus ever since the election of a concerted attack emanating not just from Democrats and their mainstream media minions, but also from her own party establishment elites, including even John McCain, her former running mate and the man who picked her for the Veep slot.
The heart of the campaign has been that she is too stupid and too conservative to win. I suspect that many Republican voters have become appalled and frightened by Obama’s moves to impose socialism on the nation via health care, and are looking for any way out - which means a leader they hope can defeat Obama. The timing fits: the single largest issue on the national table since the July poll has been socialized medicine, otherwise known as “health care reform.”
So, while Palin would normally have a solid claim to the socon/religious vote, Huckabee’s claim is even stronger, and social conservatives are, by their very nature, somewhat mistrustful of all this new-fangled feminist revolution they’ve been hearing so much about for the past forty or fifty years.
In times of trouble, they tend to move to the tried and true, and for them, you can’t get more tried and true than somebody like Huckabee, who runs explicitly as a Christian candidate.
The frosting on this particular short-term cake is that Sarah Palin has been pretty much hunkered down as regards the national scene. I am, frankly, glad to see it. When she returns to the national stage and raises that big megaphone that is hers to command, she has to do so with almost no missteps, so I’d much rather she takes her time and gets it right, then leaps prematurely and blows her own candidacy.
The big issue now is the elections in 2010. Sarah Palin won’t be running in them, although I expect her to influence some of them. The notion that her resignation from the Alaskan governorship has irreparably tarnished her is wishful thinking on the part of her opponents, I suspect. These sorts of issues don’t really have much staying power.
The upshot of all this is the poll that Allah ran at the end of his report. It was simple: Who do you want in 2012?
The results are as follows:
Sarah Palin - 63%
Liz Cheney - 13%
Mitt Romney - 12%
Mike Huckabee - 8%
Tim Pawlenty - 4%
Of course, Allah’s readership, like that of all the major online conservative sites, skews heavily Conservative/Libertarian. And those folks love Sarah. Which is why her numbers will rebound as socialized medicine/health care reform fails, the socon terror of Obama begins to fade somewhat, and most important, Palin rejoins the debate on the national stage in a big way.
UPDATE: I wonder what this is all about?
Sarah Palin has placed her resume on LinkedIn.


Some are upset that Palin has not taken a hand in the NY-23 special election coming up in a couple of weeks. But I think she needs to be very careful here not to waste political capital. In a three-way race, it’s very difficult to predict outcomes let alone impact of outside influences.
If polling for the Conservative looks reasonably close, she still might jump in to put him over the top. A win for the Conservative with help from Sarah would have a monstrous impact.
I think that your analysis is pretty good, but I think that there are a fair number of religious socons who think that Palin would be a fine and dandy candidate. Speaking as a member of that group, there are more than you think who are liberty minded. And for the record, other than the Huckster’s being a minister, I think that Palin stacks up quite nicely among for religious socon group.
A Palin candidacy would expose once and for all the rotten core of the GOP. Her worst critics would come from the GOP. Guaranteeing her loss wouldn’t be a problem for that group. Losing their invitations to the DC cocktail parties, however, would be the end of the world. God, how I loathe those people.
This seems to have disappeared at the link.
That aside has anyone verified that it was actually posted by Sarah Palin and not some freak? Because frankly, if Sarah wants a job with some private sector company, she’s got it. No resume required.
Note that Liz Cheney comes in second. I thought Repubs were supposed to think women should be kept barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen.
Liz Cheney isn’t exactly the type of woman to be found pregnant, well, anywhere, yet here she is polling second.
Polling second? But, but, but, I thought that Repubs hated “teh gheys.”
Andrew – I think you might be confusing Liz and Mary Cheney. Mary’s the openly gay one, who, has recently confirmed being pregnant with her 2nd child. Liz is also married (to a man) and has 5 children.
Huckabee isn’t a conservative in any meaningful sense of the word. He’s in essence Jimmy Carter with a few so-con positions. No way in hell I’d ever consider voting for him.
Wrong Cheney. Liz has five children(what’s with conservative straight women) and Mary has one. The family is keeping details on that private. can’t say as I blame them.
Mary’s pregnant again? Let me amend what I wrote before. What’s with conservative
straightwomen?There are good reasons for her resignation. Alaska, like many states, is facing some major problems. We run the government on oil. The fluctuating oil prices cause some problems, but nothing like the major drop in production. Today there is only about 600,000 barrels a day flowing, when that figure drops to 300,000 the pipeline must shut down. The gas pipeline was supposed to solve the income problem. But the price of gas is half of what it needs to be, and more sources are being tapped in the lower 48 every day.
Analysis: Major statewide upheaval coming in a couple of years. Palin did well, in establishing savings, and vetoing excess spending, but the legislature likes to override. So no matter what, the Governor in two years is going to be in trouble, even though the fault tends to lie elsewhere.
Also, Palin’s popularity in Alaska had begun to slip prior to the resignation. She was at odds with the party leaders, and the legislature.
I was one who felt her resignation was a mistake. I am quietly eating my words. It was a calculated, smart move. Her Lt. Governor has a good working relationship with the legislature, but I don’t know if he will have the backbone to do what must happen in the next two years.
Don’t worry Haverwilde. What ever bad happens I’m sure they’ll find a way to blame her.
… and Bush, genes - gotta always blame him too, right?
As if Curious George didn’t do enough stuff on his own to be blamed for…
Oops…must not comment before coffee.
Palin/Huckabee in 2012, if he can keep his mouth shut and play nice…
I’d rather have Palin/Liz Cheney. Liz is more conservative than Huckabee, and polls better.
Or after 151 and coke. Either type of coke.
Sarah Palin linkedin account is old, nothing new. Looking for a job that is a auto field. This is just another Ad hominem attack. For the MSM to push this should tell all who Axelrod Inc, Obama , MSM FEAR Palin, panic mode. If she decides to run in 2012 She will be the nominee, hands down, & the former mentioned knows this all too well. They all know she is only real challenger to Obama.
Huckabee isn’t a conservative in any meaningful sense of the word. He’s in essence Jimmy Carter with a few so-con positions.
So in other words, he’s Jimmy Carter.
I’m fairly socon myself, (although I have no problem with gay marriage) but I think a lot of the support for Huck is the GOP’S own version of identity politics.
“He’s an evangelical just like us, so let’s vote for him! What are his positions and policies, you ask? Well, he’s an evangelical, so they must be great, right?”
I actually think his support among religious socons will erode over time, but I guess we’ll see.
I hope that you’re right.