Some of you are familiar with the landmark SF works of William Gibson, and some of you have even read a book he wrote called Pattern Recognition, set in the time immediately following 9/11. The heroine of the work, Cayce Pollard, owned a jacket that played a minor, but poignant role in the book. It was her most valued possession, a black “Buzz Rickson’s” Air Force flying jacket.
I always assumed that this item of clothing was wholly of Gibson’s imagination, but no, it’s real.

It’s also pretty darned cool, if you can afford the stiff tariff.


They sell a perfect copy of that down at the army-navy store for about $40 - they work good, too, wore one for years. I think it’s still in my Cold Weather clothes box in the shed.
90 bucks online if your local AN Store doesn’t have one.
Thanks, Dodd. I love my readers.
Been weearing that jacket for years. Warm and really comfortable. Doesn’t impede movement–and it has a decent number of pockets.
And it’s reversible into a VERY visible hunting jacket.
Try the AN store first–it should be cheaper than online
Not worth it, in Texas. Anyway, my Barbour Commando jacket is cooler, in every sense of the word, plus I don’t get to look like an old biker wannabe.
Absolutely indestructible.
If you want the real thing, get one from Alpha Industries. They make the ones the US Air Force uses, and clueless tools like Sean Penn wear (see: http://www.wherestheseesaw.com/?p=10).
Yeah, I saw the Alpha version here, for eighty bucks. Some of the detailing is different, though. I think the Alpha version is the current one, and the Rickson’s probably the original. Rickson’s is legendary for monomaniacal attention to detail and accuracy. See this for a fairly accurate description of what is going on.
Oh, I know the Alpha is different — the orange lining alone tells you that. And the one above looks a bit snugger. Frankly, I’d rather have a Rickson’s than the Alpha I do own; I was just pointing out for anyone who wants a semi-decent MA-1 rather than a lot of the really crappy copies you can run into out there.
growler, you know what I’m really interested in? That Sterling Pea Coat. I used to have an authentic Navy issue back in the late sixties - my uniform then was Levi 501s, roughout cowboy boots, some sort of shirt, and that pea coat. Must have worn that combo for about a year straight at one point.
BTW, I am really upset that you introduced that site to me. They have SO MANY amazingly great clothes I can’t afford!
One more thing: Anyone in NYC who likes old clothes like this, and has serious coin, should check out a store in the East Village called Dead Stock. If I were a rich man, I would have been very happy the time I poked my nose in there.
Where are you seeing the pea coat?
I used to have a really, really old NYC cop pea-like coat, which I loved. It eventually either fell apart or got eaten by moths (I forget which). Much like my dad’s old Woolrich red-and-black plaid hunting jacket, which I wore to death. I tried to replace it with an old one from eBay, which is nice, but not quite the same.
The pea coat is here.
I have just discovered that the whole 1950-60s “traditional look” is hot hot hot in certain circles. Who knew? But apparently there is a whole blogging subculture devoted to the notion, and a big part of it is scrounging through thrift shops for the abandoned Brooks Bros. items.
I myself, for instance, picked up today at my nearby Goodwill a very nice bespoke Brooks double-breasted blazer with peaked lapels that fits me almost perfectly. It was on sale at half price, and of course I took my senor discount on top of that, so the total was $5.60 for something that cost somebody else a hell of a lot more originally. And being Brooks bespoke, it will last an eternity.
Of course, if I keep losing weight, it will have to be taken in a bit, but that is manageable with a good alterations tailor. I think I can probably have it done right here in town at the Brooks store, although I haven’t checked.
Oops. Store is called Stock Vintage. I = old.
http://nymag.com/listings/stores/stock-vintage/
Never been here, but I will go soon:
http://nymag.com/listings/stores/rue-st-denis/
A few months back (and I forget where, I’m sorry) I read an article on some guy who makes his living trolling through the West and Midwest in places that are barely towns looking for vintage denim and clothes. Fascinating.
Old Woolrich is very desirable at the moment.
In fact, all the stuff I remember from my kid-young man days it pretty cool. Now I wish I hadn’t ditched my madras sport coat, or my madras slacks. (No, I never wore them together….)
Oooh. That pea coat is nice. I’m used to the ones that flare out at the bottom.
The two stores I posted about here in NYC are PRICEY. There’s one consignment shop I know of where you can find Turnbull & Asser and other high-end brands for cheapish, but still pricey. Thrift shops I know of don’t usually have good stuff, though you can find Brooks Bros. in many of them.
Anyone we’re boring with our blather, tough.
And, aside from The Trad, what are some of those sites?
I like A Continuous Lean, both as a blog, and for his links. Just use them as a jumping off point, and keep on clicking.
I also like An Affordable Wardrobe, which is all about wearing good clothes you find in thrift shops. He’s a young curmudgeon, whose motto seems to be that men should dress like grownups.
Finally, for definitely not thrift shop clothing, I like A Suitable Wardrobe, whose proprietor, a fellow San Franciscan, apparently even wears bespoke underwear.
That NYT article on “Take Ivy” documents the underground but rapidly surfacing “Trad Trend.” Its epicenter is NYC - spawned by the Japanese, who come over here and ransack NYC thrifts for inspiration for Nipponese designer clothing lines - but I’m beginning to see the look on the street here in SF - mostly among young ethnic males - Black and Hispanic, mostly - which will probably signal an upsurge in competition to my rummaging through the Goodwills and Salvation Armies.
Which is sorta weird, in a way - archetypical WASP duds adorning what those same WASPs probably thought of as the underclasses.