Water Vapor Confirmed As Major Player In Climate Change
Because the new precise observations agree with existing assessments of water vapor’s impact, researchers are more confident than ever in model predictions that Earth’s leading greenhouse gas will contribute to a temperature rise of a few degrees by the end of the century.
Except, unfortunately for the global warming religion, temperatures aren’t rising.
Now we have to wait 92 years, until “the end of the century” - to see if it is actually happening. And you can bet that if the numbers continue to contradict their own models, they’ll start babbling about 500 years down the road.
This isn’t science. This isn’t even junk science. It’s witchcraft.
Submit to Stumbled Upon!
That and prostitution. It pains me to read any “scientific global warming” BS. It is so far from accepted scientific analysis that only prostitution comes to mind. Of course, prostitutes are much more honest.
An accurate statement.
Take a look at Climate Audit if you want to get a sense of just how shoddy the “science” is.
It’s on the basis of this that we’re to be forced to wind down industrial civilization? People who can’t even put together a 5000-station dataset are asking, no, demanding to be put in charge of the entire energy economy of the Earth? It’s beyond parody that these Keystone Klimate Kops should be allowed to run anything, or even be allowed to continue to run their own “research lab”, when it’s clear that keeping the books straight for a rural savings & loan would be beyond them.
Bill: not a witch here, not even a fan of folklore involving magick, but, at least practitioners of any sort of magick follow heuristics and algorithms between magickal objects and effects. The relationship between colors and emotions, herbs and desired outcomes, are almost, shall we say, generally agreed upon.Now whether belief translates into causality for the practicing witch, sure: complete hudu. But the AGW believers can’t even get their foundations right.
Were I a witch I’d take offense at you calling it witchcaft. But I’m not, so I’m just trying to help you have a few laughs.
It’s not even witchcraft. It’s fraud.
I was taught about GIGO in my first computer programming class in 1974. Sadly, this very useful rule seems to have been conveniently forgotten by all manner of junk scientists.
None of the current computer models can handle water vapor in more than a crude manner. When it is pointed out to the “model fanatics” that since it is well known that water vapor is the primary driver of global warming, they mutter about how it’s “hard to model.” I am yea verily filled with confidence regarding the conclusions of any such models.
Why anyone takes the GW computer models seriously is beyond my simple comprehension. None of them are accurate in making retrospective predictions–i.e., if you plug in historical data in rolling twenty-year blocks they completely fail to accurately predict known historical weather patterns. In science there is a technical term for theories that do not match observations. They are called “wrong.”
All current global warming models also rely on a set of 80-year-old equations which have recently been shown to be erroneous. Science at its best.