Did Hitler Have Anything To Do With the Holocaust, By the Way? » « More On The Oakland Airport Anti-Troop Incident 


Rhetorical Question
September 30th 2007 Immigration, RINOs

Sure is a Thin Fence - By Mickey Kaus - Slate Magazine

Sure Is a Thin Fence: There’s a picture of some of the 70 miles of new border fence in today’s LAT. But it seems to be a single-layer fence. I thought we’d ordered a “double-layered” fence. … Are President Bush and DHS Secretary Chertoff–who’ve never liked the fence idea–trying to make it ineffective? …

Yes (rhetorical answer).

Submit to Stumbled Upon!
-Bill Quick







Comments on this post:

  • genes
    September 30th, 2007 | #1

    The second fence is an Invisible Fence. Now if we can get all the Mexicans to wear those collars….

  • ShoreMark
    September 30th, 2007 | #2

    Ah, so you’re the other guy that saw the remake of “Wild, Wild, West” :-)

  • GeorgeAtkisson
    October 1st, 2007 | #3

    Hmm, so if we sell the collars in Mexico as “stealth devices” to avoid detection, then just shoot off a few hundred random razor discs with tracking beacons on a daily basis, then recover and repeat, this just might pay for itself. If nothing else, it would end the revolving door of catch and re-catch.

    “Brilliant!”

  • Ed
    October 1st, 2007 | #4

    Took a year to build that?

  • Lorenzo
    October 1st, 2007 | #5

    “Took a year to build that?”

    Sure, Ed. It’s in the desert, so they didn’t work during the four hottest months, and the nearest fence contractor was probably a couple travel hours away (on the clock), so they only worked about four hours a day. Plus, the workers had to take time out to help dig out trucks stuck in the sand. Ironically, a Mexican fence company could have done it in one-third the time for half the cost.

  • Bill Quick
    October 1st, 2007 | #6

    Ironically, a Mexican fence company could have done it in one-third the time for half the cost.

    Sure, but they would have had to use illegal immigrants from the US.

comment on this article

Note: Daily Pundit uses the Akismet spam filter, which has been known, on occasion, to start flagging regular commenters' submissions as spam for a while until we can smack it around enough to change its mind. If you're having problems like this, you can bypass Akismet by registering. Your comments are still very welcome whether you register or not. The only drawback of not registering is, if Akismet flags your comment as spam, it may take us a while before we see it and fix it.

Quicktags:

Tags allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <img src="" alt="" /> <li> <ol> <s> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <ul>
Comment Preview (updated when idle):

 


return to main page (at this post)