Hypocritical Barstids » « Wanna Pick a Fight? 


Let’s Talk About Cowards
August 26th 2007 Journalism

This was worth censoring?

Submit to Stumbled Upon!
-Clayton Jones







Comments on this post:

  • genes
    August 26th, 2007 | #1

    I’m not sure it was worth printing. it ain’t very funny. I prefer even the political toons to be funny. And if it’s in the comics it should be funny to someone without 4 degrees.
    But, no. Nothing is worth censorship. If Micheal Moore can spew his corrupt, vile vision of the world, then nothing can be censored. The paper should carry a notice in it’s spot that read’s “This Comic Suspended Because We Have No Backbone and are afraid some one will say BAD things about us”

  • Alfred Centauri
    August 26th, 2007 | #2

    I got a kick out of it Clayton. I agree with genes that, over all, it was just mildly amusing. Yet, I thought some of the body language was hilarious…

    (aw Geez, now I get this!)

    But, is it censorship or is it cowardship?

  • Barry
    August 26th, 2007 | #3

    cowardship

    They’re all cowards.

  • Bill Quick
    August 29th, 2007 | #4

    It’s cowardice. Angry Muslims will torch your office and blow up your cars, if sufficiently enraged. And Islamist calibration of “sufficiently enraged” is a fairly low level.

  • Alfred Centauri
    August 29th, 2007 | #5

    Angry Muslims…

    A pleonasm?

  • genes
    August 29th, 2007 | #6

    A pleonasm

    Show off. I would just have said: Isn’t that redundant?

  • Alfred Centauri
    August 29th, 2007 | #7

    Show off

    Heck, you’re too kind; I was hoping for at least a “smart-ass” or better!

  • Bill Quick
    August 29th, 2007 | #8

    Alfred, I can’t wait for you to run into our busy foreign desk editor, David Gillies, who has been known to gargle with puree of thesaurus before posting here.

    By the way, re: pleonasm, it depends on which end of the construction is lopped off.

  • Alfred Centauri
    August 29th, 2007 | #9

    it depends on which end of the construction is lopped off.

    Good catch! That’s what I get for trying to use one of them fancy ten dollar words. I should have gone with my first thought which was to reply to ‘Angry Muslim…’ with ‘Is there any other kind?’

comment on this article

Note: Daily Pundit uses the Akismet spam filter, which has been known, on occasion, to start flagging regular commenters' submissions as spam for a while until we can smack it around enough to change its mind. If you're having problems like this, you can bypass Akismet by registering. Your comments are still very welcome whether you register or not. The only drawback of not registering is, if Akismet flags your comment as spam, it may take us a while before we see it and fix it.

Quicktags:

Tags allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <img src="" alt="" /> <li> <ol> <s> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <ul>
Comment Preview (updated when idle):

 


return to main page (at this post)