The Corner on National Review Online
In an interview with CNN today, former Senator Fred Thompson’s position on constitutional amendments concerning gay marriage was unclear.
Thompson believes that states should be able to adopt their own laws on marriage consistent with the views of their citizens.
He does not believe that one state should be able to impose its marriage laws on other states, or that activist judges should construe the constitution to require that.
If necessary, he would support a constitutional amendment prohibiting states from imposing their laws on marriage on other states.
Fred Thompson does not support a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.
Seems fair enough to me.


There, fixed it for ‘em.
I wonder how Thompson feels about Loving vs Virginia:
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/loving.html or a host of other sources. (There were (flimsy) bibilical arguments for anti-miscegenation laws.)
Let’s see Bill. Loving was decided on an EXISTING amendment to the Constitution. So I’m missing whatever you think the point of your question is.